More Clients,
Less Complexity
Focus on growth, not investment administration. Our managed account solutions give you time to nurture your clients and grow your business.
Looking back at May’s dataflow and what it may mean for portfolio positioning.
May combined wild swings in oil with stubborn inflation. More than ten weeks into the conflict, the IEA described an unprecedented supply shock, with cumulative losses from Gulf producers above one billion barrels. Prices moved sharply on shifting hopes for a US-Iran deal, while April’s inflation data showed how much of the shock had already reached consumers: US CPI and PCE both hit 3.8%, and the RBA now expects headline inflation to peak at 4.8%.
Some supports held. The RBA signalled room to pause after its third hike, US core PCE rose less than expected, the US-China tariff truce stayed in place, and SpaceX’s IPO filing showed primary markets reopening. The bond market was less forgiving, with the US 30-year yield reaching its highest level since 2007.
Oil swung on every headline in May, but the inflation it had already caused was harder to move.
Supportive signals
Watch-outs
May’s defining feature was the gap between oil prices and the inflation they had already caused. Brent futures swung on every headline about a US-Iran deal and ended the month almost 19% lower, but the IEA’s data showed a physical market still in deficit, with inventories drawing at a record pace. April’s inflation figures captured the earlier spike: US CPI and PCE both reached 3.8%, and the RBA forecast a 4.8% peak for headline inflation.
Underneath, the pulse had not broadened. US core PCE rose just 0.2% for the month, China is choosing patience over stimulus, and the RBA has signalled it can pause. The pressure point was the bond market, where the US 30-year yield reached its highest level since 2007, while in Europe weak growth and 3% inflation had forecasters expecting rate hikes rather than cuts. Policymakers retain some room to manoeuvre.
Equities: Signs that the RBA’s terminal rate may be in place, and a softer US core PCE print, are constructive for rate-sensitive equities. The reopening of primary markets, led by SpaceX’s filing and a likely OpenAI listing, signals confidence in the structural growth themes we favour, including AI, manufacturing and energy infrastructure. Against that, share market valuations are already elevated, and we remain tilted toward companies with strong structural growth that are less exposed to supply disruption.
Fixed income: The softer core PCE print is constructive for duration, but the long end remains under pressure, with the US 30-year at its highest since 2007 and the curve steepening. Markets have priced out Fed cuts through at least the end of 2027, and until the Fed and RBA signal a greater focus on supporting growth, we remain cautious on the outlook for interest rates.
Alternatives and real assets: Energy remains the dominant variable. With the global oil market in deficit and inventories drawing at a record pace, a continued blockade would intensify pressure on prices and on supplies of essential goods such as fertiliser and sulphuric acid.
A constructive base case does not imply a smooth ride. The supply shock is still working through the inflation data, and the path of oil depends on whether the blockade continues.
Practical implications:
Scenario probabilities reflect our current assessment and are reviewed as new data emerges.
Base case: 72% probability
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has pushed energy prices higher and disrupted the supply of essential goods such as fertiliser and sulphuric acid. If the blockade continues, these pressures are likely to intensify, and we have tilted portfolios toward companies with strong structural growth that are less exposed to supply disruption. We entered this period from a position of strength, with healthy corporate profits, supportive government spending, relatively easy borrowing conditions and plentiful oil supply before the conflict.
Inflation had been slowing before the conflict, but rising energy prices have pushed expectations higher. If it proves persistent, the greater risk is a slowdown in consumer spending and demand destruction. Most central banks cut rates last year and those benefits are still flowing through, but until the Fed and the RBA signal a greater focus on supporting growth over controlling inflation, we remain cautious on the outlook for interest rates. Liquidity also matters: higher oil prices pull money out of the financial system, though continued support from China and the US Treasury underpins activity and commodity demand.
Looking further ahead, structural growth themes remain intact, with investment in AI, domestic manufacturing and energy infrastructure expected to broaden profit growth. Resilient earnings, government spending support and the lagged effects of last year’s rate cuts provide a reasonable foundation for markets, though within a more volatile environment than recent years.
Bear case: 14% probability
The key risk is a meaningful pullback in consumer spending, particularly in the United States, the primary engine of global growth. If households tighten their belts while valuations are elevated, and inflation persists or Fed support fades, both profit margins and market prices could fall together. The longer the Iran conflict continues, the more likely this becomes. A sustained oil spike of 50 to 100% above recent levels would feed straight into prices and squeeze demand, producing the kind of stagflation that is historically one of the hardest environments for both shares and bonds, with central banks unable to cut and high government debt limiting fiscal support.
China adds a further layer of risk. If its property sector weakens and stimulus fails to restore confidence, Chinese growth could slow materially, directly affecting Australian national income and earnings given our reliance on Chinese demand. In this scenario a more defensive approach would be warranted, with higher cash holdings, reduced share market exposure and a tilt toward healthcare, consumer staples and utilities.
Bull case: 14% probability
In the most positive scenario the Iran conflict ends relatively quickly and a recovery follows. Falling energy prices, easing supply pressures and improving diplomatic relations support stronger growth while keeping inflation in check. If trade disputes also resolve, profits could grow strongly as input costs fall and consumer spending holds, with continued adoption of AI and other productivity-enhancing technologies lifting output across industries without the widespread job losses many fear.
Government spending would add further support, and strong household and business balance sheets leave both well positioned to respond. For Australia, the rate cuts of 2025 and relatively low public debt give policymakers room to act. If interest rates stay below inflation, conditions remain supportive for asset prices, and a growth-oriented portfolio with low cash and more exposure to industrials, materials and financials would be well placed.
May left the energy shock unresolved. Oil swung on every headline about a US-Iran deal, but the inflation already in the system was harder to shift, with US CPI and PCE at 3.8%, the RBA forecasting a 4.8% peak and the US 30-year yield at its highest since 2007. The supports are still there: US core inflation has not broken higher, China is holding policy in reserve, the RBA can pause and primary markets are reopening. We remain constructive, tilted toward structural growth and cautious on rates while the blockade persists.
Focus on growth, not investment administration. Our managed account solutions give you time to nurture your clients and grow your business.
Active asset allocation, high-quality investments and disciplined risk management across diversified portfolios.
Portfolios tailored to your firm, backed by proactive communication.
Clients retain direct ownership of investments. Complete transparency and dependable communication.
A disciplined process and an investment team managing portfolios since 2007.